Welcome to the Montana State University Farmworker Housing Studio

Welcome to the Montana State University Farmworker Housing Studio

This blog is a collection of design research done by graduate students at the Montana State University School of Architecture who are looking at farmworker housing shortages in the Yakima Valley of Washington State. The studio is being assisted by the Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing and the Catholic Charities Housing Services in Yakima, and will include input from the UN-Habitat Housing and Slum Upgrading Branch. The studio prompt is to study the relationships between infrastructure and infill, home and place, mobility and permanence, boundaries and community. What kind of infrastructure is required for different kinds of farmworkers in the USA? Can this infrastructure perform technically, socially, economically, and poetically? What are the tectonics of home, the architecture of economics, and how can design facilitate better living conditions for these communities? In short, how does mass-housing become mass-homing?

Our goal is to take advantage of our academic setting to offer new ideas and approaches to a persistent challenge. With this in mind, we aspire to imagine diverse approaches to affordable farmworker housing that perform optimally for its users' diverse values, interests and desires. We welcome your feedback so please leave comments, suggestions and ideas.

For direct questions or comments please contact David Fortin at david.fortin@montana.edu or at 406-994-7579.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Workforce Economics


These diagrams illustrate the correlation between employment and wages between the years of 2005 and 2011.  The top set of graphs, illustrating Yakima County’s employment as a percent of the workforce highlights the extreme fluctuation of workers during the year.  Assuming that the baseline agricultural workforce from January to December are permanent employees working in the manufacturing and processing sector of agriculture, then the summer months add an equal amount of temporary workers for the cherry and apple harvests.  One interesting observation is that the economic downturn didn’t affect the agricultural sector as much as other sectors.  The temporary workers continued to increase, because as the US population continues to grow, the food production needs to grow as well.  However, the permanent workforce likely shrunk, because less people were employed in the 2009 winter months than the 2008 winter months.

The bottom half of the diagram represents the quarterly wages paid to the workers.  Looking at agriculture, there isn’t a direct relationship between the worker increase and the wage increase.  This implies that, despite the average numbers over the course of the year, the temporary summer workers are paid a fair amount less than the permanent workers.  This makes sense, because temporary workers are paid by the amount harvested.  As more temporary workers enter the workforce for a given acreage of farmland, the overall value becomes more distributed, generating less wealth per farmworker. 

This illustrates a need for housing that accommodates both the permanent and temporary worker with the necessary adjustments to accommodate for the varying farmworker incomes.

No comments:

Post a Comment